Good discussion, and some equally good thoughts scattered through the comments.
I received a question in email recently asking whether I’d ever blogged my understanding of sola Scriptura. I haven’t (so far as I can recall), but I hope I’ve illustrated where I’m at. Still, I though it would be worth jotting it down....
This is a worthwhile review of what sounds like a worthwhile book. Readers know that I have long contended that any discussion of inerrancy requires serious discussion of the definitional problems. This book shows a keen awareness of that initial task. Wallace writes:...
Thanks to all of you (nearly 50) who responded to my survey. It’s still open so that others can chime in. I’ll be using these thoughts as fodder for my trip to Nashville this week, as its goal is to experiment with creating some content / teaching videos...
I was recently received a question about inerrancy from a student in my MEMRA institute. Readers here know I’ve spent a lot of time on that subject (see the archived page). My short answer was that the difficulty in talking about inerrancy and errancy is...
This short piece was posted by Larry Hurtado today. Good food for thought, especially in the context of our (now old) discussion of inspiration (which we will revisit at some point). Larry targets fundamentalists (read: black and white thinkers) on both the...
I had occasion to send this file to someone by email who asked whether or not NT writers used Second Temple Jewish interpretive methods when handling the OT. They do. We’ve talked about this subject a couple of times before, so I thought you’d be...
And best of all look at the Top 5 Posts [right hand menu down a bit] and click on the Breaking News about the Discovery of Q. Goes back a month or two but he that hath eyes let him see!!