The fly-by photographs taken of Pluto as part of NASA’s New Horizons mission to gather data on Pluto have been all the rage on the internet. Naturally, not everything has gone as expected; there have been technical glitches. Equally as normative, voices on the internet conclude that any glitch must mean a NASA conspiracy. Richard Hoagland, most famous for promoting the “face on Mars” for decades believes that something fishy is going on to conceal evidence of ET intelligence via artifacts on Pluto. What else?
Stuart Robbins, the force behind the Exposing PseudoAstronomy has managed to stay on top of all the conspiracy theories spawned by the New Horizons mission. Here’s Stuart’s summary of what Richard Hoagland thinks about Pluto:
1. The Pluto system is young or artificial: Because no rings or tiny moons have yet been found, as was predicted (and therefore “MUST” be found IF the system is natural), then the bodies are either made of material that does not produce rings or tiny moons (ergo artificial) OR it’s incredibly young (ergo artificial).
2. Richard thinks it was created by a Type II civilization (can harness the energy of a solar system) that died 65 million years ago and so isn’t enough time to accumulate rings / tiny moons. It has archives/libraries where our “true” history is stored, and it didn’t suffer from the exploding planet that created the asteroid belt at that time which is also why neither Pluto nor Charon should have many craters.
3. He expects the “regular, geometric patterns” that are evidence of this civilization to be prominent. He also thinks the cantaloupe terrain on Triton is buildings buried by methane ice that NASA released but just never mentioned, and he expects to see more of it on Pluto.
4. “We’ve already found some staggering, repeating, right-angle geometry that has no business being there, and yet no one has commented about it because they don’t know what to say!”
5. The “weird computer outage” was a warning to NASA to not show what’s really there … from “somebody.”
Here’s an archive of Stuart’s eight (as of this evening) podcasts chronicling the mission and debunking the pseudo-scientific conspiracy talk that has accrued to it.
Sure Hoagland, and that cloud up in the sky right now that looks for all the world just like the head of a dinosaur must mean that an alien spaceship manipulated the cloud structure in order to intentionally draw a picture in the sky for me…
Fact is, Pluto is just a rock floating in space out there that isn’t even a planet and there are probably at least 50 other ones just like it. Why would we expect it to be specially picked out by an an ancient alient civilization to live on when they have 50 others to choose from? Or, did they artificially create all of them?
And of course, Pluto isn’t even the size of our own moon, so why would he even expect such a small thing to have it’s own moon? I doubt that any of those other dwarf planets that accompany Pluto out there have moons, so is he saying that (by that ridiculous criteria) they must all be necessarily artificial? So that means that he must think that just about any and everything floating around out there in space must really be old alien spacecraft in cognito – until proven otherwise. He begins by assuming the ridiculous and then asks us to prove him wrong. What planet does HE live on?
Do people really take this guy seriously? What a joke!
yeah, they do.
Thank you very much, nice sharing