That's the question Antonio Paris asked on the Aerial Phenomenon blog.
Have a look - a nice graphic illustrating the difference between science and pseudoscience.
Editor's note: added the image:
Just in case you haven’t had anything creep you out lately. Here you go: Resident Evil? DARPA Unveils Genetic “Tuning” To Fight Chemical, Radiation Attacks Of course. This would never lead to anything else.
Short answer: No. But to read the click-bait headlines circulating on the internet in the last couple of days, you’d think so. All you need to do is read NASA’s own announcement — just the first paragraph: NASA’s Curiosity rover has found new...
Here’s the latest “infographic” video from Shaun. I think this audience will appreciate it a lot and find it useful for helping others to think through this issue. I’ve written (and commented in podcast episodes) that the Bible was not intended...
What could go wrong? Maybe Planned Parenthood will want in on this . Or not. It means babies being born. My bad. And another one: Progressive Eugenics Is Hardly History–the Science and Politics Have Just Evolved
This article ought to make all those people who have equated the mark of the Beast with microchips blush with naive embarrassment and then curl into the fetal position: “Nanochips And Smart Dust: The Dangerous New Face Of The Human Microchipping Agenda”...
Yes, you read that correctly. Good thing I don’t need to make things up for my novels. Stuff like this makes freaking readers out a whole lot easier. Thanks, scientists!
0 Comments