Kevin Randle offered an interesting post today describing the about-face of Dr. Richard O’Connor (note that several commenters on this blog defended this guy early on). O’Connor was the scientist who offered a forensic analysis without a body — he declared from the blurry slide that what many knew up front was a mummy was “non-human”. Well, at least he’s come to his senses.
But to be honest, I’m not impressed. How anyone — especially someone with credentials and experience — can draw such a conclusion without a shred of biological evidence (not so much as a DNA sample) is inexcusable. More than that, it’s downright embarrassing. I’d ask what he was thinking, but it doesn’t appear he was thinking at all.
Michael,
Congrats on your terrific commentary in Jack Brewer’s recent article.
I’ll keep it short – since I’m a civilian in this field – I literally have no bridges I have to worry about burning.
So – I will just say, imo, that it is obvious that all of the Mexico City Sliders perpetuated a hoax.
I do not buy that they were simply misinformed, or some other gibberish.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Thanks for this. I don’t have bridges either. It’s just hard for me to believe (still) that people (other than nearly all politicians) can just be so willingly and studiously corrupt. But I know that’s on the table.
What happened in Roswell really then?
Roswell was a Paperclip technology screw-up.
And “Aliens” body’s is???
can’t make sense of this as worded.